At 3, I meet Gail for my doctor’s appointment with a Maxillofacial / Oral Surgeon. After my near-nervous breakdown in 2006 over a tooth (the same tooth), I do not want to make any mistakes, and so I am consulting with the best of the best.
A nurse brings us in to an exam room and asks me to step on one of those balance-beam scales that seems to be in every doctor’s office. Why can’t they have digital ones? Aren’t they more accurate? I step on the scale and it registers three pounds higher than my scale this morning. Could my breakfast have added this much weight? Or maybe was it the large latte I finished minutes before? The no-nonsense nurse entertains none of my questions.
The doctor comes in. I like him immediately. He reviews my chart, checks my tooth, and then confirms what I have already been told:
- I have substantial bone loss around tooth #20.
- A periodontist can try and save the tooth through a bone graft, and if that can’t be done, the tooth will need to be prepared for an implant.
- In 2006, when this same tooth received a crown, the crown was not properly placed, as there was no contact with the adjacent tooth.
- Over time, food has gotten in between the teeth and has caused substantial bone loss.
- The STANDARD OF CARE with the placement of a crown requires contact with its neighboring teeth.
- In other words, my problem (and substantial upcoming expenses) today could have been avoided if the work I had done in 2006 had been done properly.
I am not surprised by what I hear, but still, it is unsettling. Especially since the statute of limitations on malpractice suits is two and a half years.
No comments:
Post a Comment